Hey I was just wondering were I would post information about my kick starter and other crowd funding news? and if anyone has already started the topic please let me know.
The Mentoring Room - Ask the Working Pros
This is a Public Topic geared towards first-time filmmakers. Professional members of The D-Word will come by and answer your questions about documentary filmmaking.
You can do it in the Classifieds topic, Dillon.
In reply to Eva von Schweinitz's post on Wed 30 Apr 2014 :
Now that you're a Professional member, Eva, a better place for your post is the Marketing and Distribution topic. Normally we discourage "double posting" but in your case it's justified.
And welcome to The D-Word, by the way.
thank you so much for the thorough answer. Everything you say makes a lot of sense. To answer your questions:
My film is not French, though I feel like it could do well in a French market. This is what Gonella Films said in their e-mail:
"We are based in France, but we have clients all over the world. We can sell your film to television channels and VOD platforms in different countries. We have recently sold short films to TV channels as Canal + (France, Spain, Belgium), Arte, TV5, among many others. "
What you say about them wanting to build their catalogue seems to be part of why they're interested. I'll get in touch with some of the filmmakers they represent, that's a great idea.
Gonella Films was the only distributor that contacted me with an exclusive offer.
The others have been online distributors, such as the VOD platform SnagFilms and I have an opportunity with vimeo's new VOD Audience Development progam.
As I'm hoping to show my doc at more festivals, I'm holding off from distribution right now to keep it eligible, but it's good to know where to go from there.
I now got the professional membership (yay) and will look around elsewhere on this forum. (Thanks, Doug!)
Hi, all. I'm doing a documentary that basically asks the question "why hasn't this awesome medical treatment been adopted after 20 years?
The answer I'm presenting is systemic, but I'm having difficulty finding qualified medical professionals who are willing to be interviewed because they're afraid that I'll make them look bad. Trying to explain to them that I'm trying to make the point that there would be no way for them to have known doesn't seem to help.
The ones who do want to be interviewed want to sign a contract saying that they have a right to not have their interviews published if they think I'm going to say something bad about them. Could someone point me to resources for navigating this kind of difficulty? I'd specifically like to know if this kind of contract is common, what the pros and cons are, and if it's going to double my meager budget to hire a lawyer to navigate the issues.
In reply to Andrew Iden's post on Thu 1 May 2014 :
I can't really answer your question with authority, Andrew, because I haven't usually been in the position of the employer. Usually I'm like you, looking for a job. But I'm curious to hear if other people have a response. Personally, I think it's a good idea to cold email people that you want to work with. In my limited experience, you're likely to get a good response if you happen to email them on the day when they just realized they need somebody like you. By the time two days go by, they've forgotten about you already. So if you email somebody and don't get a great response, it's probably just your timing is bad. Probably not that they're offended you contacted them directly. Why would they be offended? It doesn't hurt them when you try to contact them. So I say go for it!
I'm looking to connect with another filmmaker who has used licensed music from a music publisher (not an original score or from a stock music house) in their documentary and is selling the DVD to libraries and educational institutions.
I have a specific question regarding the music licensing and public performance rights in an educational setting.
I just joined the D-word and am waiting to be approved for professional status. I appreciate hearing from anyone who has experience with music licensing for library DVD sales.
Now that you've been approved as a Pro, Margie, best you re-post your question in the Legal topic. Many more members will see it there.
I have an audio question I'm wondering if someone might be able to help me with: I'm using a Rode NTG-3 with a Canon XA-10. When I listen to the audio I record, it definitely sounds a bit muddy, as if it's clipping. But the levels when I import into FCP 7 aren't showing clipping. Moreover, the levels on the camera aren't showing clipping either when I'm recording. Thoughts on how I might solve this?
As you've just been admitted as a Full member, you might wish to repost this in the Member's Topic Sound and Music
I'm in the outlining phase of a documentary that will follow three different groups that work on communication in different ways, but with a core similarity. I'm also working on a separate documentary that tracks one of those groups through a 2-month training intensive in the wilderness. I have a few questions, I'd appreciate any help, or if you can redirect me to part of the site that is more suited to my question.
1. One of these films already has 1Tb worth of footage, and I'm only 1/4 of the way into the filming phase. I've been taking a few words of notes on each day, and thinking to put that into a searchable word document to cull through when I'm done. I've also put each day's clips in a separate labelled folder. What are people's methods of organizing such a mass of footage and/or taking notes on it during the shooting phase?
2. With the piece that I'm just starting to outline, I'm wanting to start arranging interviews but I'm nervous because I don't know what the narrative thread will be. It could be more of a "let the speakers and clips speak for themselves," or I could do voice-overs as the POV narrator throughout the film. How much of the arc/narrative style of the film really needs to be decided this early on, if any? I'm worried about not feeling confident during the interviews (they require travel) and regretting not taking more time to prepare.
Is there anyone who knows where I can get some help with fixing Beta deck Sony UVW 180 in New York city?
We have a beta deck Sony UVW 180 and we are trying to put it back in use after a few years on the shelf. We are going out from the deck into a Sony converter box DVMC-DA2. But Log and capture in FCP 7 doesn't work...The Log and Capture window shows “no communication'...
You might try Technisphere, Jessie.
No need to sign your name after a post, btw, as it appears above it automatically.
In reply to Doug Block's post on Wed 9 Jul 2014 :
Is Technisphere still in business? Because I went there and it was closed even though it was monday. And when I call the store number, it says 'this number is temporally unavailable.'
So do you guys happen to know other store similar to Technisphere?
Sony Professional Service is in Teaneck, NJ, also as an option. Usually pretty reliable, but they'll probably be at least $300 just to look at it. "No communication" on the capture window would make sense, since the converter box doesn't offer any deck control. Choose "non-controllable device" and make sure you're getting video in via the firewire port. Apple has some info about this whole process here , if that helps troubleshoot it at all.
In reply to Eli Brown's post on Wed 9 Jul 2014 :
Thank you so much for store info and link, Eli!!
I tried to log and capture numerous times with non-controllable device setting but video doesn't show up.....I don't know if deck is wrong or converter box is wrong or rca cable is wrong or Final Cut setting is wrong.....
I don't think we have that much budget for fixing this.....T.T And with that money, I think it's better to just ask a store to digitize beta tapes rather than fixing beta cam deck..
Is there anyone who knows cheaper and closer store? Or could you guys recommend good and cheap place which can digitize beta tapes?
Hi – I'm a former AP at PBS whose been out of the newsroom for several years finishing up grad school. Now that I'm a professor (with an actual equipment budget!) I'm looking to invest in my own professional-grade video camera equipment for a one-man band within my means (around 5k). This would be for possibly airing on TV or in film festivals. I would really appreciate suggestions on what to get. Based on some lists I've seen online, I've narrowed down the choices to these few, but I'm sure there are lots of stuff I'm missing. Thanks for any help or feedback:
ALSO – Here was my top list based on prices of HD:
Panasonic AG-HPX250 AGHPX250 P2 HD Hand-Held Camcorder + 32GB DSHC Card (10) + Tripod + Deluxe Accessory Pack
Sony HXR-NX5U NXCAM Professional Camcorder
Sony PMW100 One 1/2.9" Exmor CMOS XDCAM HD422 Handy Ca
Canon XA20 Professional Camcorder
Canon XH-A1S 3CCD HDV High Definition Professional Camcorder wit
Panasonic HMC40KIT Camcorder and Mic Adapter/Holder with 12x
And in terms of 4K cameras:
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-GH4KBODY 16.05MP Digital Single Lens Mirrorless Camera with 4K Cinematic Video (Body Only)
This is an interesting selection, Khadijah – but this Topic is mainly for beginners, which you clearly are not! If in any doubt as to the purpose of a Topic, virtually all have a brief description at the top of the page underneath the title.
You should use the Search Function (top right of every page) to look through the Cinematography Topic in particular as there have been many detailed discussions on specific cameras which you might find useful.
Thanks John, I'll do that!!! Plus, I still think of myself as a novice when it comes to buying equipment, but thanks for vouching for me :-)
I've signed up to the D-Word as an unusual situation has presented itself, and hopefully some of you guys can offer some advice.
I work mainly making short online promos, commercials and corporates, but over the years have produced and directed three full length web-docs, (30-60mins).
I've been approached by an agency who have a multi-national client in a fairly controversial industry – palm oil – who are looking to produce a documentary about what they do in a developing part of the world. However, they don't want to produce an 'expensive' corporate film that no one will watch – they want to get it broadcast on TV, preferably globally.
Normally, it wouldn't be my job to tell them how to do this, but this time it is. And unfortunately, I don't really have any experience on that side of it. I just make em!
Obviously there are a few ethics and transparency issues here. There probably aren't too many mainstream broadcasters who'd be eager to snap up what is effectively corporate propaganda and put it on their channel. I've had conversations with the agency about this, and have told them of the need for honesty and transparency and independent voices within the field to fend off allegations of corporate shilling or astroturfing.
So I guess the questions I have are:
Are corporate sponsored films a complete non-starter for broadcast? Let's assume I make an honest, transparent doc, that although in 'association with GloboCorp', doesn't shy away from asking and answering the tough questions to paint an honest picture of their operations, would broadcasters be open to acquiring it?
Would a broadcaster pay for it, or would 'GloboCorp' have to pay? (Presumably this ratchets up the whole ethics issue if the company were to pay to have it shown!)
What would be the best way to approach broadcasters, pre-production with a treatment or post-production with the completed film?
I apologise if this gets anyone's back up. I'm sure some people might not be too comfortable with the idea of the D-Word discussing corporate propaganda. That said, I wouldn't touch this project if I was being asked to produce a film about how they don't go tearing down the rainforest if they're tearing down acres of rainforest.
As I've had it pitched to me, there are a lot of misconceptions on the subject and a lot of untold stories, and the company is (I'm told) looking to present their work in a way that let's people make up their own minds.
Ok, so I've probably gone on long enough. Over to you guys and thanks in advance for any advice!
Interesting situation Neil.
I heard someone complaining recently that Liberia's new Government had agreed to oil palm plantations.. Not just any government, but one that now has a very high ethical bar, compared to the past. Already there are stories of corruption related to the contract and people losing their land. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf
It made me wonder what is the other side of the story.. undoubtedly jobs for Liberia.. but how many and at what cost, what protection of the environment will there really be.. and so on.
I doubt a broadcaster would fund something that was effectively directed by the company or accept something they had funded.
You have access.. that counts for something. It should be about how effectively you manage that access to create a transparent film. Involving a broadcaster during production would allow them to push all the really awkward questions forward.
In reply to Neil Gaerhard's post on Wed 23 Jul 2014 :
First of all, congrats on all of your thoughtful questions. It's clear that your approach to filmmaking must be equally methodical and inquiring into the nuance of choices made.
As a veteran Producer/Exec Producer of many docs broadcast on national PBS, I can say that there's the rule, and then there's the implementation of the rule. They aren't always the same.
It's clear that you understand the principle of self-aggrandizement. And it seems that the company is proposing a film that has broader significance than that. But it can be a grey zone. I recall once when my local PBS station launched production of a documentary profiling the patriarch of the Gallo family. IIRC, it was paid for by a donation from Gallo Wines to the wine industry's professional association here in the Bay Area, and then re-granted to KQED. A huge uproar ensued and ultimately, KQED aborted the project and funds returned.
Other broadcasters might be more flexible in their interpretation.
I might suggest that you contact the legal depts of the potential broadcasters and see how they respond to the query. My experience with PBS is that the legal dept is available for such conversations.
Hi Julia and Vivian,
Thanks so much for your thoughts and advice.
I'm thinking that an approach that may make it more attractive to broadcasters while also helping with the transparency issue could be to have the doc fronted by a high profile presenter from an environmental background. Someone deeply skeptical of palm oil and not afraid to scrutinise the company's claims. If the company genuinely feels it has the evidence to back its position up, they should have the cojones to welcome that... right? ;-)
Thanks again, I'll let you know how it goes!
Thanks Neil, it does sound very interesting and worthwhile if you can get it right. Love to hear more and email if you'd like more direct input.
I'm in pre-production on a documentary that will involve videotaping people performing material that is copyright protected – specifically, excerpts from plays. I'm trying to figure out if I need to get licenses for the use of the plays from the copyright holder, or if that's the responsibility of the people who are creating the performances (because I'm just documenting an existing performance). Any thoughts/ideas/places to look would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
My thought is that you are responsible for licensing this copyrighted material, even if you're not the one saying the words aloud. Because you're using the playwright's work as part of your documentary. If anything, the copyright holders are more likely to go after you than after the performers. Because let's say they're in a basement theater, performing for a few dozen people. But you're making a film that can be reproduced and distributed and seen by millions (ideally!) so you're even more of a threat to the copyright holders.
The only way you could legitimately get away with using others' copyrighted material is under the doctrine of "fair use," which you can read more about here: http://www.cmsimpact.org/fair-use
But in my opinion, based on the limited information in your post, you don't have a fair use case. Fair use is for situations (to give one example of one use; there are others) like you're following somebody throughout their day and they walk past a TV showing a TV show. It's fair use to show that in your doc without licensing the TV show. But if they sit down to watch TV and you focus on the TV and let the camera roll for 5 minutes... then you're not gonna be able to make a compelling case for fair use. Because at that point you're just using somebody else's work. Same thing for if someone gets up in front of your camera and performs a long monologue from a Broadway show. It doesn't matter that they were gonna do it even if you weren't there. The point is that you ARE there and you are capturing that work and when you show it on the Internet somebody may say, "Wow, that was great, glad I saw it, now I don't have to pay to go see the show on Broadway." That's gonna piss off Broadway.