I would highly recommend you attend film school if you really want an in depth knowledge of the deep traditions you are working in and attempting to build upon and if you can afford it.
However, if you just want to get as much cash as quickly as possible, that may be necessary.
But consider the case of James Longley. He is thankful that he attended two years of film school in Russia, studying Soviet montage. And his films are truly masterful in their editing. Check out his mastery of Soviet montage in Iraq in Fragments. I daresay you haven't seen editing of that caliber frequently.
Longley has only made three films. However, all three have been nominated for Oscars, and deservedly so. I'm sure he would tell you that film school was not irrelevant in that score.
And ask yourself, if you have only made three films and been nominated for three Oscars, what are your career prospects?
So if you are interested in more than fast money, I would recommend you actively consider it.
Just my view. There's 100 years of film history by people more profound than myself that deserve more than cursory and casual attention.
I just don't see what's wrong with a detailed study of Vertov, Hitchcock, Bunuel, Kurosawa and Kubrick. Study, deep study and reflection, on their own terms, free of hypercommercialized and contaminating influences that command us to: "G go make money now".
The hypercommercialization of cinema (and culture generally) has its drawbacks. They should always be contemplated when making big decisions such as this.
In reply to Ana Da Silva's post on Mon 17 Mar 2008 :